Choosing your sources -
how to flexibly route nervous messages
July 26, 2017
Neurons in the brain work together in small populations of some thousands of cells, which together encode incoming information. When the activity of the neurons is coordinated, oscillations of activity are often observed at the population level. These oscillations are transient and irregular, and their role in modulating the activity of other, distant areas is not understood. Oscillatory activity could potentially work as a temporal structure that organizes the transmission of information between distant parts of the brain. Much as in a conversation, if the short transients of oscillatory activity or bursts happened in a non-coordinated manner, different brain areas would not be able to communicate. Palmigiano et al. however found that distant neuronal networks can coordinate short oscillatory bursts of activity spontaneously when connected by strong links.
Flexible information transfer
They found that coordination of oscillatory bursts between brain areas then dictates how information flows between them. Depending on how the transient oscillatory bursts organize among distant populations, information can flow through different routes. Think about the example of three interconnected brain areas. A target area might receive simultaneously relevant information from an input area and irrelevant information from another one. How to know which one to listen to? Palmigiano et al. have found that these transient episodes of oscillatory activity in each area can provide a flexible temporal structure that allows to have uni-directional information transfer between areas that have strong connections in both directions. Areas whose oscillation temporally leads the others act as senders while those that lag behind are optimal receivers. Intriguingly, these configurations can alternate after some hundreds of milliseconds.
Attention: steering information transfer
How to then select which one to listen to? Strengthening the background input to a particular area already makes its oscillatory bursts precede in time the other ones, turning it into a sender. Somewhere in the brain, we decide where to attend, and once we do, a signal would be sent to the area encoding the relevant inputs, while other inputs coded by non-preceding areas would not make it through. Evidence for this type of mechanism of routing external input signals has started to emerge also experimentally: recordings revealed that areas of the primate brain involved in processing an attended object, engage in coordinated oscillatory activity significantly different to those areas involved in processing non-attended objects.
The results offer a robust mechanism for flexible and self-organized routing of inputs that does not rely on building specific connections between distant brain areas, but on the dynamical interplay found of distant brain regions.